Much fuss has been made lately about MetaMask updating their terms of use. In particular, this clause:
4.3 Taxes. Each party will be responsible, as required under applicable law, for identifying and paying all taxes and other governmental fees and charges (and any penalties, interest, and other additions thereto) that are imposed on that party upon or with respect to the transactions and payments under this Agreement. All fees payable by you are exclusive taxes unless otherwise noted. We reserve the right to withhold taxes where required.
To understand the context, we must look at the entire section this clause belongs to:
https://i.imgur.com/E1uj7py.jpg
They’re very clearly talking about sales tax on “offerings” in their app. Offerings being the optional products and services available to users, including the ability to purchase crypto with fiat. Indeed, we can see just last week MetaMask expanded its offerings to integrate direct crypto purchases with PayPal:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/metamask-rolls-out-eth-purchases-via-paypal-to-us-users
Furthermore, we must apply basic logic to these allegations. It is claimed that MetaMask has the ability to withhold your crypto assets for tax purposes. This is a problematic line of thinking for two reasons.
MetaMask’s source code is freely available and reproducible, yet we are not seeing any changes to the codebase that would facilitate crypto freezing
https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension
If MetaMask did implement a crypto-freezing feature, it would be easily circumvented as users could simply import their private key in a different wallet app and move their crypto freely
Thanks for listening.
submitted by /u/zoomercoomer9000
[link] [comments]